Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2017 Q96: Indian Polity – Emergency Provisions

UPSC Prelims 2017, General Studies Paper I · Indian Polity

Which of the following are not necessarily the consequences of the proclamation of the President’s rule in a State? 1. Dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly 2. Removal of the Council of Ministers in the State 3. Dissolution of the local bodies Select the correct answer using the code given below:
  1. (a) 1 and 2 only
  2. (b) 1 and 3 only
  3. (c) 2 and 3 only
  4. (d) 1, 2 and 3

Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only

Explanation

Consequences of President's rule in a State (Article 356)

The question asks what does not necessarily follow.

ConsequenceNecessarily follows?Fact
1. Dissolution of the State Legislative AssemblyNoThe Assembly may be suspended or dissolved
2. Removal of the Council of Ministers in the StateYesThe President takes over the executive; the Ministers go
3. Dissolution of the local bodiesNoPanchayats and Municipalities keep working

So the answer is 1 and 3.

Key rules:

RuleDetail
ApprovalBy both Houses of Parliament within two months
DurationSix months at a time; maximum three years
S.R. Bommai case (1994)The Assembly should not be dissolved before Parliament approves the proclamation

Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

President's rule (Article 356): Council of Ministers is dismissed; Assembly is suspended or dissolved; local bodies continue. Bommai (1994) limits dissolution.

Remember

President's rule: Ministers go; Assembly may only be suspended.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Underline 'not necessarily' in the question. The certain consequence is the wrong choice here.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock