Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2013 Q39: Modern History – Constitutional Developments & British Plans (1909 - 1947)

UPSC Prelims 2013, General Studies Paper I · Modern History

The people of India agitated against the arrival of Simon Commission because
  1. (a) Indians never wanted the review of the working of the Act of 1919
  2. (b) Simon Commission recommended the abolition of Dyarchy in the Provinces
  3. (c) there was no Indian member in the Simon Commission
  4. (d) the Simon Commission suggested the partition of the country

Answer: (c) there was no Indian member in the Simon Commission

Explanation

Agitation against the Simon Commission

The Indian Statutory Commission was appointed in November 1927 to review the Government of India Act, 1919.

All seven members were British; there was no Indian.

FactDetail
ChairmanSir John Simon
ArrivedFebruary 1928, at Bombay
ProtestBlack flags and the slogan 'Simon Go Back'
TragedyLala Lajpat Rai died after a lathi charge at Lahore (November 1928)
Indian answerThe Nehru Report (1928), a draft constitution

The options checked:

OptionVerdict
(a) Indians never wanted a review of the 1919 ActIncorrect; they wanted a review with Indians on it
(b) It recommended abolition of DyarchyIncorrect; that came later, in its 1930 report
(c) There was no Indian memberCorrect
(d) It suggested partitionIncorrect

Answer: (c) there was no Indian member in the Simon Commission.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

Simon Commission (appointed 1927, arrived 1928): all-British; 'Simon Go Back'; Lala Lajpat Rai's death; answered by the Nehru Report (1928).

Remember

Simon Commission: no Indian member.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

'All-white commission' is the standard phrase. No Indian member was the insult.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock