UPSC Prelims 2011 Q49: Current Affairs – International Organisations & Groupings

UPSC Prelims 2011, General Studies Paper I · Current Affairs

Recently, the USA decided to support India's membership in multi - lateral export control regimes called the "Australia Group" and the "Wassenaar Arrangement". What is the difference between them? 1. The Australia Group is an informal arrangement which aims to allow exporting countries to minimize the risk of assisting chemical and biological weapons proliferation, whereas the Wassenaar Arrangement is a formal group under the OECD holding identical objectives. 2. The Australia Group comprises predominantly of Asian, African and North American countries, whereas the member countries of Wassenaar Arrangement are predominantly from the European Union and American continents. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation

Australia Group vs Wassenaar Arrangement: checking both statements

Both are multilateral export control regimes, but the statements here describe them incorrectly.

Statement	Verdict	Reason
1. Wassenaar is a formal OECD group with identical objectives to Australia Group	Incorrect	The Wassenaar Arrangement is itself an informal arrangement (like the Australia Group), not a formal OECD body; and it targets conventional arms and dual-use goods/technology, not specifically chemical/biological weapons
2. Australia Group is predominantly Asian/African/North American; Wassenaar is EU/American	Incorrect	This reverses reality: the Australia Group is predominantly Western/OECD countries (including many European nations), not Asian/African

The two regimes, correctly:

Regime	Focus	Nature
Australia Group	Chemical and biological weapons proliferation control	Informal, mostly Western/OECD members
Wassenaar Arrangement	Conventional arms and dual-use goods/tech	Informal, broader international membership

Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2.

Why each option is right or wrong

(a) Incorrect. Statement 1 misdescribes Wassenaar as a formal OECD body with identical objectives; it is informal and focused on conventional arms/dual-use tech.
(b) Incorrect. Statement 2 reverses the membership profile; the Australia Group is predominantly Western/OECD, not Asian/African.
(c) Incorrect. Neither statement correctly describes these regimes, so 'both' cannot be right.
(d) CORRECT. Both statements contain factual errors about the nature, objectives, and membership of the two regimes.

Key point

Australia Group (chemical/biological weapons control) and Wassenaar Arrangement (conventional arms/dual-use tech) are both INFORMAL regimes; statement 1's 'formal OECD' claim and statement 2's membership-profile claim are both wrong.

Remember

Australia Group = chemical/biological weapons control. Wassenaar = conventional arms/dual-use tech control. Both informal, both Western-heavy.

Common mistakes

Assuming the Wassenaar Arrangement is a formal institution under the OECD.
Reversing the membership composition of the Australia Group and Wassenaar Arrangement.
Treating both regimes as having identical objectives, when their focus areas differ (CBW vs conventional arms/dual-use).

Exam tip

Both the Australia Group and Wassenaar Arrangement are informal regimes with Western-heavy membership; their focus areas differ (CBW vs conventional arms/dual-use tech).

Sources

Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India — Joint Statement by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Barack Obama, New Delhi (8 November 2010)
Australia Group — Guidelines for Transfers of Sensitive Chemical or Biological Items
Wassenaar Arrangement — Guidelines and Procedures, including the Initial Elements (1996)

← Q48All UPSC Prelims 2011 questionsQ50 →

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQs Take a timed mock