Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2007 Q43: Indian Polity – Judiciary

UPSC Prelims 2007, General Studies Paper I · Indian Polity

Consider the following statements: 1. The mode of removal of a Judge of a High Court in India is the same as that of removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court. 2. After retirement from office, a permanent Judge of a High Court cannot plead or act in any court or before any authority in India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  1. (a) 1 only
  2. (b) 2 only
  3. (c) Both 1 and 2
  4. (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (a) 1 only

Explanation

Removal and post-retirement restrictions on judges

StatementFact check
1. Removal of a High Court Judge follows the same mode as a Supreme Court JudgeTrue — Article 217 applies the same impeachment procedure (Article 124) to High Court judges
2. A retired permanent High Court Judge cannot plead or act before ANY court/authority in IndiaFalse — Article 220 bars such practice except before the Supreme Court and other High Courts; the statement omits this exception

Only statement 1 is correct.

Answer: (a) 1 only.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

High Court and Supreme Court judges share the same removal procedure (Art 124/217); Article 220 bars a retired HC judge from practice in India EXCEPT before the Supreme Court and other High Courts — the given statement 2 wrongly omits this exception.

Remember

SC and HC judges share the same removal procedure; Article 220's post-retirement bar excludes the Supreme Court and other High Courts.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Article 220's bar on a retired HC judge's practice has a built-in exception (SC and other HCs) — absolute 'cannot act in ANY court' statements are a classic UPSC trap.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock