Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2006 Q55: Indian Polity – Judiciary

UPSC Prelims 2006, General Studies Paper I · Indian Polity

Consider the following statements: 1. A person who has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court cannot plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court. 2. A person is not qualified for appointment as a Judge of a High Court in India unless he has for at least five years held a judicial office in the territory of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
  1. (a) 1 only
  2. (b) 2 only
  3. (c) Both 1 and 2
  4. (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation

Rules for High Court Judges

StatementVerdictReason
1. A former permanent High Court Judge cannot plead or act in any court or authority in India except the Supreme CourtFalseArticle 220 bars practice in courts below the Supreme Court and High Courts, so the exceptions are the Supreme Court and the other High Courts
2. A person needs at least five years' judicial office to be a High Court JudgeFalseArticle 217(2) requires ten years in a judicial office (or ten years as a High Court advocate)

Both statements are incorrect.

Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

Article 220 lets a retired High Court Judge practise before the Supreme Court and other High Courts, and Article 217 requires ten years of judicial office, so both statements are false.

Remember

HC Judge qualification is ten years, not five; Article 220 exempts the SC and other High Courts.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Article 217(2): ten years of judicial office or ten years as an advocate; Article 220: practice barred except SC and other High Courts.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock