UPSC Prelims 2006 Q131: Ancient History – Buddhism & Jainism
Consider the following statements:
1. The Ikshvaku rulers of southern India were antagonistic towards Buddhism.
2. The Pala rulers of Eastern India were patrons of Buddhism.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Answer: (b) 2 only
Explanation
Ikshvakus and Palas
| Statement | Verdict | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 1. The Ikshvaku rulers of southern India were antagonistic towards Buddhism | False | The Ikshvakus of Andhra, with their capital at Nagarjunakonda, patronised Buddhism |
| 2. The Pala rulers of Eastern India were patrons of Buddhism | True | The Palas of Bengal and Bihar supported Buddhist centres such as Nalanda and Vikramshila |
Only statement 2 is correct.
Answer: (b) 2 only.
Why each option is right or wrong
- (a) Incorrect. Statement 1 is false, since the Ikshvakus supported Buddhism.
- (b) CORRECT. The Palas were great patrons of Buddhism.
- (c) Incorrect. Statement 1 is false, so both cannot be correct.
- (d) Incorrect. Statement 2 is true, so it is not 'neither'.
Key point
The Ikshvakus of Andhra patronised Buddhism (Nagarjunakonda) and so did the Palas of Bengal and Bihar.
Remember
Both Ikshvakus and Palas supported Buddhism.
Common mistakes
- Assuming all Hindu-named dynasties opposed Buddhism.
- Confusing the Ikshvakus of Andhra with the Ikshvaku clan of the Ramayana.
- Forgetting the Palas' link with Nalanda and Vikramshila.
Exam tip
Buddhist patrons: Ikshvakus (Nagarjunakonda), Palas (Nalanda, Vikramshila).
Sources
- R. S. Sharma — Ancient India (NCERT textbook for Class XI)
- Encyclopaedia Britannica — Pala dynasty