Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2002 Q5: Medieval History – Delhi Sultanate

UPSC Prelims 2002, General Studies Paper I · Medieval History

The historian Barani refused to consider the state in India under Delhi Sultans as truly Islamic because
  1. (a) the majority of the population did not follow Islam
  2. (b) the Muslim theologists were often disregarded
  3. (c) the Sultan supplemented the Muslim law by framing his own regulations
  4. (d) religious freedom was accorded to non - Muslims

Answer: (c) the Sultan supplemented the Muslim law by framing his own regulations

Explanation

Why Barani refused to call the Sultanate state truly Islamic

IdeaBarani's position
Shariat as the only lawA truly Islamic state rules only by the Quran, Hadith and Fiqh
ZawabitSultans such as Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad bin Tughlaq framed their own regulations (zawabit) above the Muslim law
Barani's workFatawa-i-Jahandari and Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi argue for a state serving the faith
Resulting viewBecause the Sultan supplemented the Shariat with his own rules, the state was not fully Islamic

The historian Ziauddin Barani held that a ruler must enforce Islamic law. He criticised the Sultans who issued secular decrees, zawabit, to deal with problems the Shariat did not cover. That is why he refused to treat the Delhi Sultanate as a truly Islamic state.

Answer: (c) the Sultan supplemented the Muslim law by framing his own regulations.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

Zawabit = state regulations framed by the Sultan; Barani's ideal was a Shariat-bound Muslim ruler.

Remember

Barani: the Sultanate was not purely Islamic because Sultans framed zawabit.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Link Barani to zawabit; the reason is always the Sultan's own law-making.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock