Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2001 Q76: Modern History – British Administration & Economic Policies

UPSC Prelims 2001, General Studies Paper I · Modern History

Under the Permanent Settlement, 1793, the zamindars were required to issue pattas to the farmers which were not issued by many of the zamindars. The reason was
  1. (a) the zamindars were trusted by the farmers
  2. (b) there was no official check upon the zamindars
  3. (c) it was the responsibility of the British Government
  4. (d) the farmers were not interested in getting pattas

Answer: (b) there was no official check upon the zamindars

Explanation

Why many zamindars did not issue pattas under the Permanent Settlement, 1793

PointDetail
Permanent Settlement (1793)Lord Cornwallis; land revenue fixed for ever; zamindars made owners of land
PattasWritten documents the zamindars were supposed to give to ryots, stating the rent
Why they were not issuedNo official check — the Government watched only that revenue reached it on time
ResultRyots became tenants-at-will, open to rack-renting and eviction

The Settlement guarded the Company's revenue but did little for the cultivator. The zamindars were told to give pattas, yet there was no official check to make them do it, so many simply did not. Later laws such as the Bengal Rent Act of 1859 and the Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885 tried to protect tenants.

Answer: (b) there was no official check upon the zamindars.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

Sunset Law: a zamindar who failed to pay revenue by sunset on the due date lost his estate, which was auctioned.

Remember

Permanent Settlement: pattas not issued because there was no check on zamindars.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Colonial revenue systems protected the State's income first; look for the missing safeguard.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock