Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

UPSC Prelims 2000 Q5: Indian Polity – Union & State Executive

UPSC Prelims 2000, General Studies Paper I · Indian Polity

Consider the following statements about the Attorney General of India: I. He is appointed by the President of India. II. He must have the same qualifications as are required for a Judge of the Supreme Court. III. He must be a member of either House of Parliament. IV. He can be removed by impeachment by Parliament. Which of these statements are correct?
  1. (a) I and II
  2. (b) I and III
  3. (c) II, III and IV
  4. (d) III and IV

Answer: (a) I and II

Explanation

Statements about the Attorney General of India

StatementCorrect?
I. Appointed by the PresidentYes — Article 76
II. Same qualifications as a Supreme Court judgeYes — Article 76(1)
III. Must be a member of ParliamentNo — he is not a member, though he may speak in either House (Article 88)
IV. Removed by impeachmentNo — holds office during the pleasure of the President

Under Article 76, the President appoints as Attorney General a person qualified to be a judge of the Supreme Court.

He is not a member of either House, but under Article 88 he may speak and take part in the proceedings of both Houses, without the right to vote.

There is no impeachment: he holds office during the pleasure of the President.

So only I and II are correct.

Answer: (a) I and II.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

The Attorney General has audience in all courts in India (Article 76(3)) and is not a full-time government servant.

Remember

Attorney General: Article 76, appointed by President, not an MP, no impeachment.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Speaks in Parliament, never votes, serves at the President's pleasure.

Sources

Practise UPSC Prelims PYQsTake a timed mock