Jasvin ThinksPracticeMock testsCurrent affairs

CAPF AC 2022 Q65: Indian Polity – Union & State Executive

CAPF AC 2022, Paper I (General Ability and Intelligence) · Indian Polity

The landmark case of D. C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar in the Supreme Court is related to which one of the following powers of the Governor?
  1. (a) To repromulgate ordinances
  2. (b) To appoint a Chief Minister
  3. (c) To grant pardon, etc.
  4. (d) To revise the emoluments and allowances of the MLAs

Answer: (a) To repromulgate ordinances

Explanation

D. C. Wadhwa case and ordinances

How to think: this case is about the misuse of the ordinance power.

Dr D. C. Wadhwa, an economics professor, found that Bihar had kept ordinances alive for years by issuing them again and again.

FactDetail
CaseD. C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar, 1987
What Bihar didRe-promulgated 256 ordinances between 1967 and 1981, some for up to 14 years
RulingRepeated re-promulgation without placing the law before the legislature is a fraud on the Constitution
Governor's powerOrdinances under Article 213

The rule: an ordinance is a temporary law for urgent need when the House is not sitting.

It must be approved within six weeks of the legislature meeting again.

Later case: in Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (2017) a seven-judge bench repeated this view.

Answer: (a) To repromulgate ordinances.

Why each option is right or wrong

Key point

Ordinances: President (Article 123), Governor (Article 213). D. C. Wadhwa (1987): repeated re-promulgation is a fraud on the Constitution. Krishna Kumar Singh (2017): reaffirmed. R. C. Cooper (1970): President's satisfaction can be questioned.

Remember

D. C. Wadhwa (1987): no repeated re-promulgation of ordinances.

Common mistakes

Exam tip

Educated guess: remember the phrase ordinance raj in Bihar. The petitioner Wadhwa wrote a book on re-promulgation of ordinances.

Sources

Practise CAPF AC PYQsTake a timed mock